install theme

"

We do a much greater disservice to girls, because we raise them to cater to the fragile egos of men. We teach girls to shrink themselves, to make themselves smaller. We say to girls: ‘You can have ambition, but not too much. You should aim to be successful, but not too successful, otherwise you will threaten the man. If you are the breadwinner in your relationship with a man, you have to pretend that you’re not, especially in public otherwise you will ‘emasculate’ him.’

But what if we questioned the premise itself— why should a woman’s success be a threat to a man? What if we decide to simply dispose of that word? And I don’t think there’s an English word I despise more than ‘emasculation.’

"

-

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, TedxEuston (x)

All of the truth. She’s incredible!

(via blackinasia)

(Source: owning-my-truth)

feministdisney:



scienceing:

mybluedecember:

princess-munchkin:

scienceing:


One half of the humans are female, so one half of the scientists should be female.
- Bill Nye at the Storytelling of Science at ASU

Yes, exactly. We need more girls going into science! Now there aren’t many Nobel Prizes being given to women, mostly because society pushed them away from science decades ago. But now that can all be changed, if more girls go into science. 

How the fuck does Bill Nye expect this to happen? What do you want to do, force women to enroll in science courses, regardless of whether or not they want to do it? Just for the sake of having “enough” women? Why the fuck do these fractions matter so much? It’s not like people are holding guns to our head and threatening to kill us if we become interested in science.
Maybe, just maybe, a lot of us DON’T FUCKING WANT to be scientists. Is that a crime?

Hi there, princess-munchkin. Female engineering student here. 
Bill Nye is not saying that you HAVE to be a scientist, and you are right that no one is holding a gun to my head because I am interested in science, but let me tell you some of the struggles of being a woman in the STEM fields. 
1) Because I am a woman, I am not expected these fields. I first fully realized this when I was in high school, on my robotics team. See, although my robotics team was about 50% female, most of the women were part of the “business administration” side of things: finance, marketting, PR, membership, etc. Was this a problem? Absolutely not. But I was there to be an engineer, and specifically, to be the robot programmer. This was met with a lot of hesitation at first from some of the other students (all of whom happened to be male. This is not necessarily a bad thing.) You see, all of the robot programmers before me were guys. Computer programming is just a thing that guys do, or so they thought. Even after I had proved myself to the mentors on the team, many of the students still underestimated my abilities. There were rumors going around that I wouldn’t have been able to program the robot at all if the lead software mentor wasn’t there to help me. This was just flat-out false, but it wasn’t until I won an award for the team that the other students actually saw my merit. 
2) There is not a lot of encouragement for women to go into these fields. I first noticed this when I was in elementary school. I was always interested in math, science, you name it, but many of my teachers and family members pushed that to the side for a long time. When I asked for legos for christmas, I would get ballet slippers. In fact, for a long time, I was training to be a professional dancer. I loved to dance. I loved math more, but no one seemed to notice that about me. It wasn’t until I had a long conversation with one particular teacher in high school that I decided to look into engineering. I had never even considered it as an option before, because no one decided to encourage me to pursue my interest in science. If it hadn’t been for that teacher, I would probably not be at the school I am at right now. 
3) For a long time, Engineering/Science/Math WAS a “boys only” club. Let me tell you when some of the top technical schools and societies started letting women in:
RPI, The oldest tech school in the country, founded in 1824. Started admitting women in 1942 to “replace men called to war.” Campus housing for women wasn’t constructed until 1966. 
Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honors Society - Founded in 1885. Started admitting women in 1968.
Caltech - Currently rated #3 in undergraduate engineering. Founded in 1891. Started admitting women in 1970. 
Georgia Tech - Currently rated #5 in undergraduate engineering. Founded in 1885. Started admitting women in 1952. 
Do you see the implications of this? Engineering has been a part of our society since around the late 1800s (in the case of RPI, since the 1820s), but women weren’t even allowed in for the most part until the 1950s, regardless of their merit. 
4) Because of the fact that it was a “boys only” club for such a long time, there are not a lot of women engineers and scientists to look up to. When you’re reading your physics, chemistry, and math text books, the majority of those theories were came up with by men. It is true that much of our history was written by White Men, but this does not mean that the fact that there are few women scientists to look up does not matter. 
So, as you can hopefully see, princess-munckin, or anyone else that shares the opinions of princess-munchkin, Bill Nye was not arguing that women that are not interested in STEM should go into those fields anyway. But he IS arguing against all of the systematic barriers set up against women who ARE interested in engineering and science. There are several women out there who are just as good as the boys at math and science, but will never pursue their interests because it just doesn’t seem like an option. That was me for a long time. I am super grateful for the fact that I fought against that, and that I ended up where I am. 
if you don’t like science, fine. Don’t be a scientist. But if one day you have a daughter and she shows interest in being a scientist, PLEASE encourage her. Because Bill Nye is right, there needs to be more women scientists in the world. 

A+ comment



^ I think the above commentary is important as well for how we can apply it to larger conversations about inclusion. If a group is vastly underrepresented in any field, a reply of, “well clearly they’re not interested so why force them to be interested?” is too glib. That ignores a lot of the reasons leading up to why X group might not be interested at that final point (adulthood etc) or ignore why interested people in X group might still be turned away from Y field regardless of their interest/qualifications.
aimalyn:

rareandradiantmaiden:

gaymermaids:

knifeplay:

girl-bear:

campaignofdistractions:

“The monetary cost for a rape victim to receive treatment at a hospital in the United States.”

EVERYONE
EVERYONE
EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THIS

what the actual FUCK

I wish I could even be shocked

Just gonna keep reblogging this

Why in the world are the two Plan B tabs $94 each? 

the concept of virginity

ecoprudefemme:

american-ruby:

  • is heteronormative
  • excludes males
  • disrespects rape survivors
  • objectifies females
  • reduces women to how men perceive them sexually
  • erases female sexuality
  • reinforces oppressive ideals of femininity and masculinity
  • in itself, doesn’t even make sense
  • reduce sex to male penetration
  • weaponize penetration as a depreciation against women

(Source: femminista-fatale)

racebending:

femfreq:

wundergeek:

I love Anita Sarkeesian and Feminist Frequency. LOVE. So I get really upset at the bullshit that gets hurled her way for daring to be a woman with an opinion on the internet. THE HORROR.
So I thought I’d poke fun at the astonishing unoriginality of Anita Sarkeesian’ critics with a sarcastic flow chart, because who doesn’t love sarcastic flow charts?. (For a full explanation, check out my post here on Gaming as Women.)

 

My brain hurts.
nativnuance:

The 8 White Identities, by Barnor Hesse. Breaking down the white gaze.

Men And Feminism: Where’s Is The Love?

friendlyangryfeminist:

Some people really have a problem with referring to him- or herself as a feminist. Generally, even if someone still believes in gender equality, they still tend to get defensive when someone calls them a feminist. This is clear in first segment of an article published in the Guardian written by a man who, when asked by a fellow journalist to answer some questions about male feminism, agreed to speak, but was adamant about not being labeled a “feminist.” He asserted that being called a feminist was “in roughly equal measures as a compliment and an insult.”

I find that the term “feminism” is wildly misinterpreted over and over again. If you really consider it, feminism provides a counterpoint to patriarchy and the standardization of gender roles, which affects men too. 

Men are expected to be strong, aggressive moneymakers who go out and make a difference in the public sphere, while women must remain docile caregivers confined to the home. Feminism allows men to make the sandwich and women to win the bread - allowing families a modern flexibility that the patriarchy makes impossible. 

These prescribed gender roles are breeding grounds for misogyny and misandry alike. By forcing men to become only public actors, the patriarchy forces women to become singularly acted upon - objects rather than subjects. Women in this way have become a social body entirely objectified (in the grammatical sense) by the male political body, forcing a public debate of these roles in the wake of advances in healthcare, women’s rights, etc. Feminism is the discussion of the flux in gender roles, affecting people beyond the assignment of their x and y chromosomes. 

via cleveille 

This article is gross for a lot of reasons but it also displays this sort of weird naivety. 

Men are the patriarchy. The patriarchy is more than a sort of hovering cloud that controls us, it is made of people and the systems that men created and fight to protect. The patriarchy is statistics of women who have been abused and raped by men, and when women tell our stories, those men who have hurt us or stood by and done nothing - those individuals are the patriarchy too.

Men will get angry at you for identifying as a feminist, not because we’re too mean or too angry or not fuckable enough (though, that’ll piss them off) because how dare you challenge a system wherein men are the beneficiary.

There’s no rebranding of feminism that will stop men from hating women. There’s only the progress that women’s rights activists can make. 

ceedling:

giddy-stratospheres:

ceedling:

on masculinity in the context of feminism 

thank you, this is a really inspiring one!

that means so much to me <3

"

How unfortunate is it that my parents had to literally force me to wear beautiful parts of my culture because I was afraid of being ostracized, but Selena Gomez can take aspects of the clothing I grew up with and make money off of them? How unfortunate is it that South Asian immigrants and South Asian Americans are Otherized every single day for the way they look, talk, and dress, but Urban Outfitters continues to commodify and make a profit off the sale of bindis – as made popular by American pop stars?

[..] My bindi is not a way for you to present yourself as being friendly to South Asian culture while exotifying it. My bindi is from my mother, put in my drawer because it is another mark of my internalized Otherness, on top of my brown skin. My bindi is tainted by Western celebrities trying to be “cultural” or “bohemian” or “tribal.” My bindi is not just a piece of plastic, my bindi is not for sale, and my bindi is not for you.

"

-

Anisha Ahuja, “Selena Gomez, What Are You Doing?

We don’t talk about this enough, but just because you are a PoC does NOT give you the right to appropriate the culture of other PoC. And if you do this, and you think you’re any better or different from white people who do it, you are sadly mistaken. It is literally that simple. Selena really could’ve had it all but then she chose to be ignorant. (via shamelessbrowngirls)

(Source: theuglyghosts)

♥ Sunshine ♥: hotel-pink: likesboyswholikeboys: you can preach about slut-shaming...

hotel-pink:

likesboyswholikeboys:

you can preach about slut-shaming all you want, but you can’t deny there’s something very wrong with 13 and 14-year old girls going out in skirts and dresses so short they barely cover their asses and shirts with necklines so low they show off cleave…

(Source: anderson-hastings)